TOPIC:

It's a toss up between Innes & Gunn and Tokyo from brewdog.

Both were poured down the sink.

never tasted "Tokyo" but that "Inn and Gunn" is awful stuff. This is an example of the rule that just because you can make something does not mean that you should.

"DEMPSEY":3560lpnt wrote: never tasted "Tokyo" but that "Inn and Gunn" is awful stuff. This is an example of the rule that just because you can make something does not mean that you should.[/quote:3560lpnt]

Marmite beer, I quite like it.

"donnchadhc":3nmdmoty wrote: Marmite beer, I quite like it.[/quote:3nmdmoty]
I stand corrected <!-- s:mrgreen: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="" title="Mr. Green" /><!-- s:mrgreen: -->

The problem with Inis & Gunn is there is no consistency. I had one last year that was mellow and slightly sweet with a distinct aftertaste of whiskey. Not too bad but one would be enough.
On the strength of this I bought a 750 ml bottle at Christmas thinking it might go well with a mince pie and whiskey cream. It was awful, it tasted like someone had stirred sugar into a weak solution of vanilla and vinegar. I cleaned the drains with it!

&amp;quot;Lugh Longhand&amp;quot;:365xjve3 wrote: The problem with Inis & Gunn is there is no consistency.[/quote:365xjve3]I've never found that. And if I were getting a large brewery like Belhaven to make a beer for my brand, consistency would be right there at the top of the spec.