My two cents:
No clones, no competition, no judging panel.
[list:etgngb30]Clones - we have a chance to be creative; why mimic?
Competition - is everyone who contributed cash a homebrewer, and a good one at that? Gives undue influence to only part of the group.
Judging panel - again, I paid 50 quid but I might not get to vote?[/list:u:etgngb30]
I suggest we decide on a style and work up a couple of recipes.
Then the homebrewers among us are free to brew up these recipes *as samples* for all.
After that, *everyone*, whether they tasted the samples or not, votes on the recipe to brew.
Anything less seems undemocratic to me.