Setting aside the legal issues for a moment, I'd be interested to hear what people's opinions are on how such an event (or qualifying event) should be judged. Some possible options:
(a) Anyone who wants to put themselves forward as a judge can do so, and then a panel could be selected randomly from this pool.
(b) A group vote could be taken of the people in attendance at the event (assuming this is practical).
(c) Beoir members (or people registered on the forum) could elect a panel of willing participants to do the judging.
Personally, I favour option (b), but would be happy to endorse option (a) as well.
Option (c) is less appealing, mainly because I don't see any reason to privilege any particular person's opinion over anybody else's.
What do you reckon would work best?