TOPIC:

&amp;quot;noby&amp;quot;:1qg50asg wrote: Nice to see Bud Light on an ICB competition list...[/quote:1qg50asg]I nearly forgot it, too. If it wasn't for a research trip to Dunnes, there'd have been no Bud Light or Satzenbrau <!-- s:shock: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_eek.gif" alt=":shock:" title="Shocked" /><!-- s:shock: -->

&amp;quot;noby&amp;quot;:1qg50asg wrote: Are we going to change the criteria every year?[/quote:1qg50asg]I hope not. If this method gives us successful results, it should be sustainable, with maybe a bit of date-tweaking around a certain moveable feast.

&amp;quot;sbillings&amp;quot;:3gjp2zso wrote: I just want the opportunity to shout out "Point of order Mr. Chairman!"[/quote:3gjp2zso]The title is "Awardenführer", and if you're ordering I'll have a Hooker.

&amp;quot;sbillings&amp;quot;:2ewcrnss wrote: In all seriousness, I don't see why we should vote on the format of the ICB awards[/quote:2ewcrnss]


Maybe not a poll, but a discussion surely.

With this expanded list there must be a dozen stouts (to pick one category). Of course I realise, for the sake of the site, a decision has to be made 'off-line', to get it up and running (If it were me I would be sticking to micro-only, but hey...).

"And the winner of the ICB award for contract-brewed macro lager goes to..."

&amp;quot;noby&amp;quot;:l1tqrsul wrote: (If it were me I would be sticking to micro-only, but hey...).

"And the winner of the ICB award for contract-brewed macro lager goes to..."[/quote:l1tqrsul]

People get to vote for the beers they like, regardless of whether it is a micro or not. Vote for a beer because it is a quality product, not because of the capacity of the brewery. Having said that, I would be very surprised if any Macro brands place.