Tasters [i:5eabtulj]are [/i:5eabtulj]products for sale. If you can buy it, it is for sale. The purpose of that clause is to say you don't need the standardised label on stuff you are exporting.
Public Health (Alcohol) 2015
11 years 2 months ago #32
"TheBeerNut":ioaxjrgc wrote: Tasters [i:ioaxjrgc]are [/i:ioaxjrgc]products for sale. If you can buy it, it is for sale. The purpose of that clause is to say you don't need the standardised label on stuff you are exporting.[/quote:ioaxjrgc]
Good point on tasters. Thats tours with free tasters out. Presumably it will be very difficult to run any beer or wine education courses here either then.
Homebrew is not for sale though.
Public Health (Alcohol) 2015
11 years 2 months ago #33
Yep, point taken on that. But that the clause is specifically in the labelling section would bother me a bit. You can also argue, of course, that the licensee hosting a homebrew meet is not supplying the drink.
Public Health (Alcohol) 2015
11 years 2 months ago #34
I think proper legal advice is the way to go. I'm not an expert either but I don't agree with some of the interpretations I see on this thread already.
Public Health (Alcohol) 2015
11 years 2 months ago #36
"TheBeerNut":14ae1lu5 wrote: Tasters [i:14ae1lu5]are [/i:14ae1lu5][b:14ae1lu5]products for sale. If you can buy it, it is for sale.[/b:14ae1lu5] The purpose of that clause is to say you don't need the standardised label on stuff you are exporting.[/quote:14ae1lu5]
Not so. A product on a shelf, on display etc is merely an invitation to treat. The sale takes place if / when I accept your payment. I can refuse your payment if I choose not to do business with you.