×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

TOPIC:

16 years 5 months ago #7

[quote:ddfy1dti]sbillings

For some reason alcoholic drinks don't have to list their ingredients, which is a problem if you have a bad reaction to one of the additives which may be used in a beer.[/quote:ddfy1dti]

and how about when their advertising says things that are not strictly true. From "nothing added but time" and such.

16 years 5 months ago #8

Or the Porterhouse's own 0% Chemicals.

No water, no ethanol, no carbon dioxide...

16 years 5 months ago #9

"sbillings":337bltfw wrote: Or the Porterhouse's own 0% Chemicals.

No water, no ethanol, no carbon dioxide...[/quote:337bltfw]
You're getting into semantics then. As you've already said, it's generally accepted that when people refer to chemicals added to food they are talking about artificial/unnatural additives.

16 years 5 months ago #10

"a_friend_in_mead":3acegarq wrote: From "nothing added but time" and such.[/quote:3acegarq]If you start the clock when the can is sealed, then no problem there.

I'm more vexed by Guinness's "traditionally brewed". But again, I suppose that's just a question of when you start the clock.

16 years 5 months ago #11

[quote:2j8fxpmz]artificial/unnatural additives.[/quote:2j8fxpmz]
Carbon dioxide was first isolated in 1772 and nitrogran in the same year. Pumping these from a gas canister into a beer when serving it is adding a chemical by pretty much any definition.

16 years 5 months ago #12

"Atticus":2i4v5zie wrote: You're getting into semantics then.[/quote:2i4v5zie]

in defense of semantics, it is concerned with what sentences [i:2i4v5zie]mean[/i:2i4v5zie]. that's pretty important when you're having a discussion!

Time to create page: 0.145 seconds