TOPIC:

"Taf":2f3prxr1 wrote: In fairness Shane at the Well has been very encouraging in relation to how they interact with new breweries, so couldn't see them sending in the big guns over something like this.[/quote:2f3prxr1]
Might not be Shane's decision anymore, those legal departments have to justify their existence.

"dereko1969":2zduh5hv wrote:

"Taf":2zduh5hv wrote: In fairness Shane at the Well has been very encouraging in relation to how they interact with new breweries, so couldn't see them sending in the big guns over something like this.[/quote:2zduh5hv]
Might not be Shane's decision anymore, those legal departments have to justify their existence.[/quote:2zduh5hv]

mmh, I believe that coors owns the brewing business. But who know that maybe be nice about it <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

&amp;quot;dereko1969&amp;quot;:1ewhjjx5 wrote:

&amp;quot;Taf&amp;quot;:1ewhjjx5 wrote: In fairness Shane at the Well has been very encouraging in relation to how they interact with new breweries, so couldn't see them sending in the big guns over something like this.[/quote:1ewhjjx5]
Might not be Shane's decision anymore, those legal departments have to justify their existence.[/quote:1ewhjjx5]

The final decision mightn't be his, but I'd say he still has considerable influence.