TOPIC:

They might chance it, if they thought the publicity was worth the legal costs.

I got suckered by them before. Ended up defending them on radio when the Portman group banned the label for Tokyo. Felt such a fool when I heard that they had lodged the complaint about the lebel themselves.

They do make tasty beer though.

conspiracy thought here,what if Diageo top brass dont know what juniors are doing in there name and sue Brewdog,with a view to taking ownership of same. Then when Brewdog bring out the captured juniors at the court case and blow Diageo,s case wide open,they then counter sue with a view to taking over Diageo <!-- s:twisted: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_twisted.gif" alt="" title="Twisted Evil" /><!-- s:twisted: --> .

&amp;quot;Philip&amp;quot;:m3jxmz7s wrote: Surely no-one would be stupid enough to say what Brewdog said unless they were 100% genuine, certain of the facts and had proof.[/quote:m3jxmz7s]BrewDog claimed thay had been banned from last year's GBBF at the last minute by CAMRA. The details behind the story turned out to be far from that simple.

Not a stunt, here's an apology via pete brown

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="petebrown.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/someone...geo-is-probably.html">petebrown.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05 ... bably.html

Oh, those idiots! Do they know nothing of brewdog? This result is so much better than an award to the cheeky chappies from Scotland.

I feel a bit sorry for the BII in all this. I very much doubt they'll want Diageo's name on anything of theirs again. Hopefully the offers are flooding in from more savvy PR people at the likes of MolsonCoors and AB-InBev.