TOPIC:

"Con Con":103vz8fs wrote: The Revenue Commissioners are in the process of drawing up new rules and instructions for setting up a distillery which should be published early this year.[/quote:103vz8fs]

What's the betting it's:

"NO", "CANNOT", "MUST NOT", "NO NO NO"

But I might be wrong!!

Cheers

Will

"Will_D":1bqrytt8 wrote: What's the betting it's:

"NO", "CANNOT", "MUST NOT", "NO NO NO"
[/quote:1bqrytt8]


Or just pay us a massive massive bond <!-- s:wink: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt="" title="Wink" /><!-- s:wink: -->

&amp;quot;TheBeerNut&amp;quot;:1hu3v1fq wrote: Indeed. Their aim is not to stop you from doing it. Their aim is to make absolutely sure they get their cut, [b:1hu3v1fq]taking it for granted that you will do everything in your power to rip them off[/b:1hu3v1fq].[/quote:1hu3v1fq]

See , that whole culture should be dead by now . in fairness it's not like you could hide the profits in the mattress anymore .

Most businesses these day ,like say banks, actually lie the other way and pretend they're making money when they're not , no-one ever claims to be losing money when they're in profit , surely ?

I think revenue should start accepting this and become partners for growth , instead of the stereotypical " tax Collector "


*You know it makes sense !!!!





*in my best Del boy Trotter accent .....

&amp;quot;Wallacebiy&amp;quot;:2fnh2n05 wrote: See , that whole culture should be dead by now .[/quote:2fnh2n05]The problem is that it's ingrained into the legislation, which hasn't been updated in quite a long time. I think that the bulk of our law relating to drinks distilleries dates to 1830 or thereabouts. Everything got very cosy when the drinks industry was just a handful of giant, well-established, corporations and there was no real need to change. Now it'll take a brave soul to stand up and say the native drinks industry is a driver for economic growth and should get a better treatment from the law.

So, which constituencies should the Beoir Party be contesting? <!-- s:wink: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt="" title="Wink" /><!-- s:wink: -->

&amp;quot;TheBeerNut&amp;quot;:853czj45 wrote:

&amp;quot;Wallacebiy&amp;quot;:853czj45 wrote: See , that whole culture should be dead by now .[/quote:853czj45]The problem is that it's ingrained into the legislation, which hasn't been updated in quite a long time. I think that the bulk of our law relating to drinks distilleries dates to 1830 or thereabouts. Everything got very cosy when the drinks industry was just a handful of giant, well-established, corporations and there was no real need to change. Now it'll take a brave soul to stand up and say the native drinks industry is a driver for economic growth and should get a better treatment from the law.

[b:853czj45]So, which constituencies should the Beoir Party be contesting? <!-- s:wink: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt="" title="Wink" /><!-- s:wink: -->[/b:853czj45][/quote:853czj45]

All of them !!!