TOPIC:

So do brewing scientists publish least of all?

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?vie...02/18/scibeer118.xml">www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.j ... eer118.xml

A pity to see that this guy is funded and published. How can he pretend he verified his theory with such a poor population study ?
Not to mention what is said in introduction : he did not consider the social aspect of drinking. And social life in research is critical, would this be for co-working or the number of citations in papers, that this guy thinks is a measurement of the quality of publication.

And this is an totally unbiased opinion.

- A brewing researcher

That certainly makes for Grim reading.

I'd say it has as much to do with Science funding (or the lack of it) in the Czech Republic as anything alse. Avian ecologists indeed!

Well we can't really say much for his maths to begin with:
[quote:24t8b30z](157 litres each year, or 176 pints)[/quote:24t8b30z]
I make it 276.4 pints by my maths. When I went to school there were 568mls in a pint.

It's a bit wishy washy alright.