×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

TOPIC:

16 years 4 weeks ago #25

&amp;quot;EoinMag&amp;quot;:2px1baov wrote: I think I will be applying for a ban on alcohol once the law comes into power. <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

It couldn't possibly be argued against on a harm reduction basis and the other point is that they don't have anywhere near the amount of empirical data on the harms of any other substance that they do on alcohol <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

At the least it will expose the hypocrisy and double standard.[/quote:2px1baov]

My point was that all these macro beers with chemicals and that they don't inform of what chemicals are there. So if there's an argument against the headshop products that there's chemicals in them then it follows that macro beers have numerous chemicals that people are not aware they're consuming.

That mega list in the Porterhouse of all them chemicals sound just as scary as what's in these "bath salts"

16 years 4 weeks ago #26

&amp;quot;Alan Gold Label&amp;quot;:26xi5y0k wrote:

&amp;quot;EoinMag&amp;quot;:26xi5y0k wrote: I think I will be applying for a ban on alcohol once the law comes into power. <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

It couldn't possibly be argued against on a harm reduction basis and the other point is that they don't have anywhere near the amount of empirical data on the harms of any other substance that they do on alcohol <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

At the least it will expose the hypocrisy and double standard.[/quote:26xi5y0k]

My point was that all these macro beers with chemicals and that they don't inform of what chemicals are there. So if there's an argument against the headshop products that there's chemicals in them then it follows that macro beers have numerous chemicals that people are not aware they're consuming.

That mega list in the Porterhouse of all them chemicals sound just as scary as what's in these "bath salts"[/quote:26xi5y0k]

Another side effect I see from that bill is the possibility that we will have to get ingredients printed on cigarettes and also on alcohol.

16 years 4 weeks ago #27

&amp;quot;EoinMag&amp;quot;:18m9hlgs wrote:

&amp;quot;Alan Gold Label&amp;quot;:18m9hlgs wrote:

&amp;quot;EoinMag&amp;quot;:18m9hlgs wrote: I think I will be applying for a ban on alcohol once the law comes into power. <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

It couldn't possibly be argued against on a harm reduction basis and the other point is that they don't have anywhere near the amount of empirical data on the harms of any other substance that they do on alcohol <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

At the least it will expose the hypocrisy and double standard.[/quote:18m9hlgs]

My point was that all these macro beers with chemicals and that they don't inform of what chemicals are there. So if there's an argument against the headshop products that there's chemicals in them then it follows that macro beers have numerous chemicals that people are not aware they're consuming.

That mega list in the Porterhouse of all them chemicals sound just as scary as what's in these "bath salts"[/quote:18m9hlgs]

Another side effect I see from that bill is the possibility that we will have to get ingredients printed on cigarettes and also on alcohol.[/quote:18m9hlgs]

They'll have to make bigger cigarette packets so :p

That poster in hospitals saying there's jetfuel and everything in ciggies is quite powerful I think.

16 years 4 weeks ago #28

&amp;quot;EoinMag&amp;quot;:sw8rhnyr wrote: I think I will be applying for a ban on alcohol once the law comes into power. <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

It couldn't possibly be argued against on a harm reduction basis and the other point is that they don't have anywhere near the amount of empirical data on the harms of any other substance that they do on alcohol <!-- s:) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s:) -->

At the least it will expose the hypocrisy and double standard.[/quote:sw8rhnyr]

Letter in the times to that effect today
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="www.irishtimes.com/letters/">www.irishtimes.com/letters/

16 years 4 weeks ago #29

[quote:2kw4r8i5]The UN definition covers drugs producing “central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations or disturbances in motor functioning or thinking or behaviour or perception or mood.”[/quote:2kw4r8i5]


Yep that'd cover booze. Of course no judge or politician will actually outlaw alcohol.

16 years 4 weeks ago #30

&amp;quot;Alan Gold Label&amp;quot;:25p2jrdc wrote: [quote:25p2jrdc]The UN definition covers drugs producing “central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations or disturbances in motor functioning or thinking or behaviour or perception or mood.”[/quote:25p2jrdc]


Yep that'd cover booze. Of course no judge or politician will actually outlaw alcohol.[/quote:25p2jrdc]

No but they may be forced to rethink civil liberties viz a viz "gettin off yer nut".

Time to create page: 0.161 seconds